Skip to content

ETF vs direct shares: the simple compare

Should Australian investors buy Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) or individual shares? For most Australians, the answer is ETFs for the core portfolio, with direct shares only for specific circumstances. The reasoning is evidence-based, not theoretical.

The efficient market thesis in practice

The S&P/ASX 200 has averaged approximately 9.5% total return per year over long periods (capital gains + dividends). The average active fund manager in Australia has delivered roughly 1-2% less than this index, after fees.

This isn’t because fund managers are incompetent. The ASX is a relatively efficient market where information is widely available. After subtracting management fees (0.5%-1.5%), brokerage, and tax-inefficient trading, professional portfolio managers struggle to beat the index.

For retail investors picking individual stocks, the outcome is typically worse than professional managers. Behavioural factors (emotional selling, concentration, recency bias) compound the challenge.

The ETF alternative

A broad-market ETF like VAS (Vanguard Australian Shares Index) or VHY (Vanguard High Yield) tracks the ASX at 0.1%-0.25% annual fees. For global exposure, IVV (iShares S&P 500) or VGS (Vanguard International Shares) offer similar structures.

Performance tracking: within 0.1%-0.3% of the underlying index each year. You get near-market returns with minimal effort.

The math over 20 years

$100,000 invested for 20 years:

Broad ETF at 0.2% fee, 9% average return:

  • Ending balance: approximately $560,000

Actively managed Australian equity fund at 1.5% fee, 8% average return (after fees):

  • Ending balance: approximately $466,000

Self-managed direct share portfolio, assuming median retail performance of 7% (after transaction costs):

  • Ending balance: approximately $387,000

The difference between the ETF and typical retail direct-share management is $173,000 over 20 years on a $100k starting investment.

The case for direct shares

1. You have domain expertise. If you genuinely understand a specific industry (mining, banking, technology) better than the market, direct investment can capture that edge. This applies to a small minority of investors.

2. Tax optimisation for specific holdings. Direct shares allow you to choose specific sale timing, harvest losses strategically, and manage CGT precisely.

3. Franking credits from specific investments. Australian banks and resources companies distribute fully franked dividends. A concentrated portfolio of these can generate franking refunds for low-income holders (like SMSFs in pension phase).

4. Ownership and voting rights. If voting at AGMs matters to you, direct ownership is necessary.

5. You are investing less than $20k total. At very small amounts, the per-trade economics of ETFs (no dividend reinvestment at small holdings, spread costs on small orders) can be less efficient than a few direct holdings.

The case against direct shares

1. Research time burden. Genuinely informed stock selection requires hours per week of reading reports, analyst notes, and company filings. Most retail investors don’t do this; the ones who do often don’t beat the market anyway.

2. Behavioural costs. Direct share investors tend to hold winners for too short a period and losers for too long. Concentration in home-country favourites, industry sector, or familiar names reduces diversification.

3. Fee mismatch. Brokerage on direct shares is now $8-$15 per trade at discount brokers - cheap, but if you trade actively, it adds up. ETF trades are the same cost, but one ETF buy diversifies you across 300+ companies.

4. Tax complexity. Direct shares require tracking cost base, franking credits, capital gains events, and corporate actions (dividend reinvestments, rights issues, demergers). ETFs simplify this.

The hybrid approach

For many Australian investors, the practical structure is:

Core portfolio (70-85%) in ETFs:

  • Domestic equity: VAS or similar
  • Global equity: VGS or similar
  • Bonds: VAF or similar
  • Diversified across hundreds of companies

Satellite portfolio (15-30%) in direct shares:

  • 3-6 specific holdings in companies you understand
  • Usually large-cap Australian businesses with franked dividends
  • Held long-term for tax efficiency

This structure gets most of the diversification benefits of ETF-only while preserving the “engagement” and some specific advantages of direct holdings.

The SMSF specific consideration

For self-managed super funds in pension phase (where fund tax is 0%), franking credits become refundable. A concentrated portfolio of franked-dividend payers (ANZ, Westpac, BHP, Wesfarmers) can yield cash franking refunds of 4-6% per year pre-capital gains.

This strategy requires informed management and accepts concentration risk, but the after-tax yield can exceed broad-market ETFs for this specific investor profile.

Global exposure decision

For Australian investors, local-market bias is a real concern. The ASX is heavily weighted to banks and resources. A VAS-only portfolio is undiversified at the global level.

Solutions:

  • VGS (Vanguard Global Shares ex-Australia) for global equity exposure
  • IVV or similar for pure US exposure
  • Emerging markets ETFs for diversification into India, China, Southeast Asia

A typical global-diversified ETF portfolio for a 30-year-old Australian investor:

  • VAS: 40%
  • VGS: 40%
  • VGE (emerging): 10%
  • VAF (domestic bonds): 10%

Rebalanced annually. Low cost. Well-diversified.

The behavioural advantage of ETFs

Most ETF investors have dramatically lower turnover than direct-share investors. Lower turnover means:

  • Lower transaction costs
  • Fewer taxable events
  • Less exposure to market timing mistakes
  • Lower cognitive burden

For most individuals, the “set and forget” nature of ETF investing produces better long-term outcomes than active direct-share management, even when the underlying stock selection would have been reasonable.

When direct shares are clearly the wrong choice

  • You’re investing for retirement (long-term, indexed exposure is superior)
  • You don’t have time for weekly research
  • You’re in the accumulation phase and making regular contributions
  • You’re subject to higher tax rates (trading costs and tax complexity erode returns disproportionately)

When direct shares can work

  • You have genuine domain expertise in specific industries
  • You’re in an SMSF pension phase and franking credits are refundable
  • You’re at low income and want franking credits to reduce tax
  • You have time for ongoing research and emotional discipline to hold through drawdowns
  • Your portfolio exceeds $500k and concentration bias is manageable

For 90%+ of Australian investors, broad-market ETFs in an appropriate asset mix (domestic, international, bonds) produces better long-term outcomes than direct share selection. This is the simplest and most evidence-backed advice in personal finance.