Income tax 2025-26: the brackets and the stage 3 aftermath
The 2025-26 financial year operates under the post-Stage 3 tax bracket framework. The reforms reduced tax for lower and middle income earners relative to the original pre-2024 Stage 3 plan, while simplifying the bracket structure. Understanding the current brackets is central to any tax planning.
The 2025-26 income tax brackets (residents)
- $0 - $18,200: nil (tax-free threshold)
- $18,201 - $45,000: 16 cents per dollar (reduced from 19% under the 2024 reforms)
- $45,001 - $135,000: 30 cents per dollar (the broad middle bracket)
- $135,001 - $190,000: 37 cents per dollar
- $190,001 and above: 45 cents per dollar
Plus the Medicare levy (2% for most) and Medicare levy surcharge for high earners without private health cover.
What the 2024 Stage 3 revisions changed
The original (pre-Labor revision) Stage 3 plan would have:
- Removed the 37% bracket entirely
- Extended the 30% bracket to $200,000
- Started the 45% bracket only above $200,000
The 2024 revision:
- Retained the 37% bracket (now $135k-$190k)
- Lowered the 19% bracket to 16%
- Shifted the 37% threshold up from $135k to capture only high earners
- Delivered bigger tax cuts to earners between $18k-$135k; smaller cuts to earners above $200k
Winners: lower and middle income households. Losers (relative to the original Stage 3): very high income earners above $200k.
Comparison across income levels
Annual tax payable (resident, no Medicare levy considered):
- $50,000 income: $4,688
- $80,000 income: $13,688
- $100,000 income: $19,688
- $130,000 income: $28,688
- $150,000 income: $34,238
- $200,000 income: $54,738
- $250,000 income: $77,238
At $100k, effective tax rate including Medicare is approximately 21.6%. At $200k, effective rate is approximately 29.4%.
The effective marginal rate trap
For most PAYG workers, the effective marginal rate is:
- Base marginal rate: from the brackets above
- Plus Medicare levy: 2%
- Plus Medicare levy surcharge (if applicable): 1%, 1.25%, or 1.5% depending on income
- Plus Division 293: 15% on concessional super contributions for earners above $250k
A high earner with $250k income and no private health cover can face a marginal rate of 45% + 2% + 1.5% + 15% on concessional super = effectively well over 50% on additional dollars of income.
The tax-free threshold effect
The $18,200 tax-free threshold plus the Low Income Tax Offset (LITO, now $700 reducing tax for lower earners) means effective tax on a $25,000 income is only about $3%. This creates meaningful income-splitting opportunities for families where one partner has low income.
Strategy: income splitting where legitimate
For families, consider:
- Superannuation contributions for the lower-earning spouse (concessional contributions cap $30k/year)
- Distributions from family trusts to adult children (at their marginal rates)
- Investment property ownership by the lower-earning spouse (where loan structure permits)
All these require valid commercial substance, not just tax-motivated transactions. The ATO’s Part IVA anti-avoidance rule catches arrangements lacking economic purpose.
Strategy: timing around brackets
If your income sits near a bracket threshold (especially $135k or $190k), small timing changes can produce disproportionate savings:
- Deferring a bonus from June to July may move it into a year with lower income
- Bringing forward a deductible expense may shift a year into a lower bracket
- Salary sacrifice for super at 15% (plus Div 293 if applicable) vs marginal rate of 37-45%
A $5,000 bonus moved from a $190k-income year to a $175k-income year saves $400 in tax (45% vs 37% marginal, after Medicare).
Strategy: superannuation top-up
Concessional contributions are capped at $30,000/year (2025-26). For someone on $150k marginal rate of 37% + 2% = 39%:
- Salary sacrificing $10,000 reduces take-home by $6,100
- Contribution tax in super: 15% = $1,500
- Net benefit: $3,900 less tax paid for $8,500 going into super (ultimately retirement savings)
For earners above $250k, Division 293 adds another 15% on the contribution, reducing but not eliminating the benefit.
Strategy: capital gains timing
Capital gains are added to your taxable income in the year the asset is sold. For large gains:
- Deferring sale from one tax year to the next can shift the gain into a lower-income year
- Splitting ownership (where legitimate at purchase) splits the gain across two individuals’ brackets
- Timing relative to retirement can be highly effective (sell in the year after employment income reduces)
The low-income buffer
For households with one partner at lower income, the tax-free threshold means approximately $18,000 of investment income per year can be received tax-free. Interest, dividends, rental income can all flow to the lower-income spouse if structured at acquisition (joint accounts won’t retrospectively fix this).
Where to focus
For most households, the tax strategy pecking order:
- Maximise concessional super contributions (best tax efficiency at middle-to-high incomes)
- Own investment assets in the lower-income spouse’s name where legitimate
- Use family trusts for flexibility on active investment income (with professional advice)
- Time major capital gains around employment transitions
- Claim all legitimate work-from-home and work-related deductions
These basic strategies deliver most of the accessible tax optimisation. More exotic structures rarely justify their complexity for households earning under $500k.